Sujit Choudhry – Democracy Is Falling

Sujit Choudhry is a professor and renowned scholar. He uses his research to address a variety of problems that face constitutional law and politics in today’s climate. He has also spent a lot of time writing on Canadian constitutional law as well. He recently wrote a chapter that will be released soon titled “Constitution Democracies in Crisis?”

In this chapter, Sujit Choudhry focuses mainly on a tweet that former Attorney General, Eric Holder sent out in December of 2017. The tweet states that the removal of Bob Mueller would cripple the special counsel’s office, see also (Sujitchoudhry.com). If this happens, Eric Holder calls for a mass peaceful protest against it. He wants the American people to be heard. Sujit Choudhry dissects this tweet as a call to action, but also says Holder is leaving it up to the American people to determine whether government officials have truly abused their power.

All of this leaves one thing to be said. Sujit Choudhry believes that it is not only the citizens role but also the court and laws role to play in upholding the constitution and stopping the abuse of power. He believes that Holder’s red line, when look at specific context, can easily be considered democratic failure. The basic point Choudhry is trying to get across is that people in power abuse their power when they try to deceptively continue to stay in power past the term limits imposed by the constitution. This can be seen in Poland where the ruling party has done things like change voting systems, and create Interim Presidents to attempt to steer the government in their favour, click (http://constitutionaltransitions.org/director/#Choudhry).

All of Sujit Choudhry’s comments are a reflection of the current political climate of the country based on patch.com. All of these point to a deteriorating democracy as well as a rise in autocracy. He uses several other countries to support his points, making a very well rounded argument. He does believe that political mobilization may help settle the issue, but the real point he makes is that the courts must call autocracy by it’s name if the people are to be seen and heard, check out (Facebook.com).